PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant VBA_SCRIPT - assumed 'VBA_SCRIPT' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/functions_navigation.php(802) : eval()'d code on line 1
"Grazier" Wreck? - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 33

Thread: "Grazier" Wreck?

  1. #16

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    The two marks are hardly more than a couple of bumps now because it has nearly silted over & I was told it had broken in half(due to impact? age? ) hence the two marks & the two remaining bits are all that is left protruding perhaps a bit of bow & stern. Touchy><>

  2. #17
    Ausfish Premium Member
    Join Date
    May 2005

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Quote Originally Posted by Touchy
    The two marks are hardly more than a couple of bumps now because it has nearly silted over & I was told it had broken in half(due to impact? age? ) hence the two marks & the two remaining bits are all that is left protruding perhaps a bit of bow & stern. Touchy><>

    Makes sense Touchy, since she seems to have gone down in the '40's. Thanks for the info mate.

    Good luck,
    Mike

  3. #18
    Ausfish Premium Member webby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Had a few bitches sent to me regarding the gps marks I posted re the Grazier.
    Firstly there's only one Grazier wreck in the bay, although there's plenty of other wrecks.
    Secondly giving away the revelant marks, means nothing, thought even man and his dog new where the Grazier and Neilsen were.
    Thirdly knowing where it is doesnt mean to say you'll no what to do when you get there, meaning tides/right moon and more specificially the right time to fish this area.
    Fourthly there's a lot more better structure around Mud then the Grazier, as its vertuially just a bump on the floor these days.
    regards

  4. #19
    Darryl
    Guest

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Quote Originally Posted by webby
    Had a few bitches sent to me regarding the gps marks I posted re the Grazier.

    Dunno why Brian, the bloody wreck gps marks are all over google if ya look. And as for the name of the wreck it's on every dive site. Its no big secret.

    My two bobs worth.



  5. #20
    bidkev
    Guest

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Quote Originally Posted by 2iar
    [quote author=Fishin_Dan link=1139793124/0#4 date=1139796610][quote author=2iar link=1139793124/0#0 date=1139793115]Anyone ever heard of this?
    I have Once I'm back in Brizzy, we'll talk
    [/quote]


    This will of course be the one with the debonair Scottish accent :-)

    See you soon.

    Mike[/quote]

    There's nae sech thaing Jimmy

    kev

    Bad is never good until worse happens.


  6. #21

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Heres the details of the vessel

    Grazier. Steamer, wooden, 207 tons. Built at Sydney, 1924. Lbd 1 14.6 x 23.8 x 9.6 ft. Capsized by heavy seas off Mud Island, Moreton Bay, Queensland, 15 January 1948. One of her crew of eight drowned.

    Qld shipwrecks can be found here
    http://oceans1.customer.netspace.net.au/qld-wrecks.html

    Cheers Lloyd

  7. #22
    Ausfish Platinum Member skippa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Quote Originally Posted by webby
    Had a few bitches sent to me regarding the gps marks I posted re the Grazier.
    Thirdly knowing where it is doesnt mean to say you'll no what to do when you get there, meaning tides/right moon and more specificially the right time to fish this area.
    regards
    How true Brian,

    You have to know HOW to fish the spot ...... if not they're just numbers on a page ...


    Cheers,
    Tony
    Light travels faster than sound, that's why some people seem Bright ...... untill they speak

  8. #23
    westie
    Guest

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Quote Originally Posted by webby
    Had a few bitches sent to me regarding the gps marks I posted re the Grazier.
    Firstly there's only one Grazier wreck in the bay, although there's plenty of other wrecks.
    Secondly giving away the revelant marks, means nothing, thought even man and his dog new where the Grazier and Neilsen were.
    Thirdly knowing where it is doesnt mean to say you'll no what to do when you get there, meaning tides/right moon and more specificially the right time to fish this area.
    Fourthly there's a lot more better structure around Mud then the Grazier, as its vertuially just a bump on the floor these days.
    regards


    Sometimes I wonder why we try to help our Ausfish family out, when someone has to bitch about answering a question.

    I am pulling up my pants and getting out of this one, so no one misinterprets my intentions, when someone asks for some help on a topic and starts to sent me Bitching Mail.

    Sorry Westie

  9. #24

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Westie,

    although we don't speak often I know you as a great help and an even better sense of humour.........that doesn't mean let your pants fall down either!!!!

    I asked for gps plots when I first got on ausfish and I never expected the response I got, the plots where great and even if they had of been a bit out I would have been thankful all the same!

    Stop your whinning who ever you are, you are giving girls a bad name!!!!!


    Al

  10. #25
    Ausfish Premium Member
    Join Date
    May 2005

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    As the originator of this thread, I'd like to once more thank Webby and Westie for the marks (as well as the people who PM'd and others who tried to help). I'd also like to apologise for any flak you've copped in helping out a fellow Ausfisher.

    If any of the delicate souls who have a problem with this would like to redirect their ire towards me, feel free. If it's justified at all (which I don't believe it is), surely I should be the one copping it?

    As has been pointed out, this particular wreck appears very well known, and it's entirely possible that I could have obtained the information I was after from elsewhere within the public domain. However, I didn't realise that Ausfish ettiquette requires us to pursue every other avenue of information before posting a question here.

    I don't really see how this is much different to asking for marks for say, Curtin Reef or the Tangalooma wrecks. It's not as if I've demanded everyone relinquish their prized spot x's.

    Anyway, like I say, if anyone would like to point out the error of my ways, pop me a PM and leave your more helpful fellow Ausfishers in peace. Before you do though, ask yourself this: has every single mark in your GPS unit been "discovered" by you? Also, if you "discovered" the wreck yourself, how did you poisitively identify it as the Grazier?

    I may be disappointed by some Ausfishers reactions to this and I may think twice before asking a question here again, but I certainly won't hesitate in helping if I can answer one.

    Good luck,
    Mike

  11. #26
    Darryl
    Guest

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Mike dont be put off by a minority mate, you had a genuine reason for asking and you were not asking for there spot x's mate.

    Bugger them , the wreck is well known ,as well as curtain is so treat it as water off a ducks back matey.

    I'm sure Brain has.

    As for me, i'm a scrawny little 90 kilo bloke, but if they pmd me having a whinge, i would tell them to go get , (well you know the rest lmao.)

  12. #27
    Ausfish Premium Member
    Join Date
    May 2005

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Quote Originally Posted by kingtin
    [quote author=2iar link=1139793124/0#0 date=1139793115]
    This will of course be the one with the debonair Scottish accent :-)


    Mike
    There's nae sech thaing Jimmy

    kev
    [/quote]

    Kev,

    As Sean Connery once said to Billy Connolly:

    "You're a shite for shore eyesh!"

    Good luck,
    Mike

  13. #28
    Ausfish Premium Member
    Join Date
    May 2005

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    In case anyone's still interested, I was out on Saturday and decided to have a look at these marks (without the old fella on this occasion). They can't be more then 60-80 meteres away from some of my own marks.

    I've now renamed them in my GPS as "Coles Carpark" 1 & 2. I couldn't get within cooee of them. Popular spots, and certainly not amongst Moreton Bay's hidden secrets, eh? :-)

    Good luck,
    Mike

  14. #29

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    "Us Brisbane Ausfishers have a paddock with dozens of cows in it. The wonder of it is that no matter how big the paddock is, or how good the grass is at the other end, all of the cows hang out next to each other..."

    This actually happens in real life (Next time you're driving in the country have a look) and is a common phenomenon..

    Anyway, the moral of the story is that the above is true for Moreton Bay...

    Paddock = Moreton Bay
    Cows = Boats/Fisherman
    Grass = Fishing

    (I think I should lay off the booze for a while! )



  15. #30
    bidkev
    Guest

    Re: "Grazier" Wreck?

    Quote Originally Posted by 2iar
    In case anyone's still interested, I was out on Saturday and decided to have a look at these marks (without the old fella on this occasion). They can't be more then 60-80 meteres away from some of my own marks.

    I've now renamed them in my GPS as "Coles Carpark" 1 & 2. I couldn't get within cooee of them. Popular spots, and certainly not amongst Moreton Bay's hidden secrets, eh? :-)

    Good luck,
    Mike
    Sae what ye deed Jimmy! Every man and his dog outh there now you asked for the bloody co-ordinates!

    As Darryl said, mate, pay nae heed to the whingers.

    kev

    Those who are at war with others are seldom at peace with themselves.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •