ulp v pulp

[Rod_Bender]

Premium is far the better product, especially if its sitting their for 1-3 weeks unused. Runs smoother, quieter and less coughing.

[ozscott]

Whilst the RON stays in the better range longer..ie it starts of higher so does not get to critically low level as quickly, I have read from marine mechanics on the Iboats.com website that PULP is not good for traditional (including oil injected) 2 strokes. Have a search of that site - its a regular topic.

[Glenn_Woods]

Hi wessel. Better late than never.
It's a 2007 model because Gladstone Marine had no more 2006 models and could not get hold of one. So they got me the latest model, 2007 for an extra $200 on my 2006 quote.

Woodsy

[Roughasguts]

Guy's if I ain't used me boat for weeks I will give it pulp, to freshen up and the cleaning additives are pretty good. Yes it runs better and probably uses less fuel couple of Tee spoons a KM I think.

Buuuut then go back to the ULP what the motor was designed for.

I am also worried about the rumours and possibly some facts that the PULP creates more Carbon build up behind rings and inside inlet valves.

Sure this stuff wet is a good cleaner for fuel lines also washes your bore a little better (Not a good Thing) But i'm worried about the extra carbon the PULP seems to produce when it Burns.

It's early days yet but when some motors start to get there rebuild done
I think you will find extra, and early damage from using PULP only, in comparrison to ULP only.

[Kerry]

Tha handbook will outline the octane rating required, exceeding this serves no real purpose other than wasting money.

Now that some PULP is being loaded with ethanol then this is another reason to stay clear of these particular blends as far as boats are concerned.

ULP and PULP are totally different burning fuels and most outboards (not all) are only low compression engines.

Do what the handbook states.

Regards, Kerry.