hi bm
only ever used micrometers and dial gauges when measuring things to do with the reco of an engine. we would reco the motor and dyno tune and test it. 12 L bus motors, d9, small single cylinder generator motors, side valve motors, bue print racing motors lots of motors.
got the manual out for my motor a 60 hp yamaha (I know, not a Johno)
it is a
Clymer Shop manual (1)2-250 2 stroke 96-98, page 360 shows a picture of them hand surfacing a cylinder head. i read on and it is only done if head warpage is measured and less than .1 mm or 4 thousandths of an inch using 600 wet and dry on a surfacing plate. then machining is the alternative. never said not be careful as matter of fact said be careful.
reckon thick glass would do well , not ever convinced a piece of timber would.
now I know this is not a johnson but should be similar specs.
again for the yamaha page 318
good practice to replace needle bearings on rebuilds (2)
when reconditioning motors we would not put an odd sized piston in. all the time and expense was in getting the motor out and striping it down and was a pointless exercise in saving what was a small amount of money when compared to the entire job.
I'm not saying it hasn't been done and done successfully but was not practiced where I worked.
I would not do this to a car I owned because of the way I learn't and I wold not do it to a boat motor taking me and the crew out to sea.
nothing said here will change my mind on that one. (3)
this is from the world of motors outside of the marine. a head that is machined flat does not guarantee a proper seal with the head gasket when bolted back together if the finish on the head is rough. It might not seem much but depth of the finish if too deep was enough to allow a path of escape for the compressed fuel mix and lead to early failure of the head gasket. 120 grit would be in that class for these motors. (4)
its beer time and enjoy reading the differing views all from differing perspectives.