Powercat 2400 2600

[outta line]

Cheers for all the info guys and taking the time to reply

[outta line]

http://www.boatsales.com.au/reviews/...400-Sports-Cab

[Chimo]

Wonder why he is selling it with so few hours on it?

C
C

[The Woo]

I think it's borderline laughable how they refer to the later boats by the models such as "2400" etc. It alludes to it being 24ft long, but they're measuring it at 24' in MOLDED length, so including bow sprit and transom boarding platform. That, to my mind, is "cheating", and is how they end up with what we used to call a "268", meaning 26'8" long, now being a "3000". They're the smallest 24ft, or 30ft cats I've seen.
That 2400 is a 20/21ft boat to me. And for that price...... wow.
I do think you'll find a "3000" for that kind of money. The layout is better as it includes the larger central station with cooktop etc. That central moulding is actually the same as was used in the big Fastlane 40 all those years ago.
I suspect you might be looking to trailer it often though?
And sorry if I'm being "a bit rough" on them, it's just been amusing watching the same hulls "grow" over the years.

[gofishin]

Not that I've recalled seeing mate. I'll try to remember to take a closer look next time.

I don't think they (smaller models) had them, nor the old 288, but not 100% sure. Thought you might know.

Although it had its benefits, the huge kicker was main cause of at-speed tunnel thump in the 328 going up-hill, the other was fit out. A lot/most of them were way too heavy in the bow. When combined with the lowish tunnel (and the kicker), this would cause bottoming out.

If I had another, and as I said would do so in a heartbeat, I would get the grinder out and get rid of the kicker .

I think it's borderline laughable how they refer to the later boats by the models such as "2400" etc. It alludes to it being 24ft long, but they're measuring it at 24' in MOLDED length, so including bow sprit and transom boarding platform. That, to my mind, is "cheating"...

Sadly Woo many Aussy builders have gone this way. Technically it is allowed in standards, but I agree, "it's just not cricket".

At last year's BNE boat show I was shocked at just how many are now doing it; HH, HS, all/most of the cheaper GRP boys, Bar Crushers, all the production tin boys from what I recall. Glad to see CC still don't!
Cheers
Brendon

[koastal]

I think it's borderline laughable how they refer to the later boats by the models such as "2400" etc. It alludes to it being 24ft long, but they're measuring it at 24' in MOLDED length, so including bow sprit and transom boarding platform. That, to my mind, is "cheating", and is how they end up with what we used to call a "268", meaning 26'8" long, now being a "3000". They're the smallest 24ft, or 30ft cats I've seen.
That 2400 is a 20/21ft boat to me. And for that price...... wow.
I do think you'll find a "3000" for that kind of money. The layout is better as it includes the larger central station with cooktop etc. That central moulding is actually the same as was used in the big Fastlane 40 all those years ago.
I suspect you might be looking to trailer it often though?
And sorry if I'm being "a bit rough" on them, it's just been amusing watching the same hulls "grow" over the years.

I agree- sizing is confusing. I pulled alongside a 3000 which is on a pontoon down the canal from me. It looked for all intents and purposes the same length as my 26 ft cat.
I had a friend on board who was going to purchase a 3000 powercat. After test riding a few he has changed his mind and is buying a local 2nd hand GB 2670 instead.

He is financial enough to purchase either but was shocked at the price of a new Glacier Bay 26 footer 1/4 million and no trailer.

[outta line]

I under stand that the size may not be a true 24" 26" but one of my requirements is the boat has to be trailerable and under the 3.5T ... So therefore I am working off 3.5T and not size

iam heading up too powercat factory today for a chat and look at a 2600

Cheers

[gofishin]

Although I know Mick has bought a nice NC2300 WA, thought I would add a bit more info seeing as a mate has just bought a 'pre-loved' PC3000 and I now know a bit more about this model... and as these cat threads are used as a source of reference I thought I would add a bit 'for future' Ausfisher use.... plus I would like Garry to confirm something for me

His is a 99 model with 2 x 200 Zuke V6's, motors are 2006/7 vintage. Spent ~45 mins on the water one arvo last week to give him a quick training session in twin-screw docking/manoeuvring etc (yeah, it's been a long time, but it's just like riding a bike... ), but we then did a quick dash out the Manly leads and back, in a good 15+... so yes, nothing that can really provide any further info to any ride/handling comments with any 'substance' at all, but enough of a 'look & feel' to add to some points raised.

Firstly, the 3000 is indeed the original 268 hull, a nominal 26' 8" hull, original circa ~early/mid 80's. I doubt that the hull itself has had any changes, as it still has the classic John Egar lines/design traits, but obviously a hell of a lot of internal design/cosmetic and changes to pods/boarding platform etc over the years (and two subsequent 'Powercat brand' owners), and the original wheelhouse version is long-gone.

However, after the original owner went into receivership and then folded in 86 (John Egar), the next owners (Fastlane Marine) did make a 348 out of the 328 and raised the tunnel considerably before canning the model after selling them for a little while... so the original 268 could have possibly had some tweaks to tunnel height, not sure, but I doubt it. 26'8" = 8.13m excluding bow sprit and boarding platform. The 3100 is the same hull, just a different layout from their current website info. How they get to 3000 & 3100 (30 & 31 foot) in the model name change is a mystery, even with the 'two bits' added on either end...

The hull lines and hull(s) shape is very similar to the original 328 and other Powercats. Each hull lower profile is 'similar' to the 328, but without the pronounced downturned chines/gull wing shape, and each hull 'chines' are a lot narrower in comparison - and hence provide a lot less (dynamic) lift. With the deeply vee'd centre section, the potential 'lift surfaces' are a lot less than the 328, and even compared to a NC 2700 - which from memory has a planning/centre plank as well as wide chine flats on each hull (Soulfish/SHaneC, is this right???). This to me is a little surprising, as the Powercats are (were originally) a 'low tunnel' design cat in comparison to more traditional cats, and hence as I understand the concept the hulls need to provide lift too. The 328 hull(s) certainly produced decent lift from the larger gull-wing chines on each hull (plus from the 'lower' tunnel and the tunnel kicker).

From the 'looks' the 3000's would need/like to go fast... Possibly a good reason why there are generally bigger donks on the back of 268's, 3000 & 3100's when compared to the NC 2700 (although the PC's are a wider boat). But then, bigger donks mean a heavier ass too, and as the seas increase, there is a point where you just have to slow down ... At rest with ~350L fuel (not full), ~120L water and a bit of gear, the tunnel at the stern is only ~20-30mm above the waterline at rest on this one (with no POB).

Woo, can you confirm if the smaller older models (and even newer for that matter), had kickers in the tunnel like the 328's had (i.e. big/huge glassed-in trim tab in the tunnel at the transom)? This is one thing I cannot recall about the smaller models.

Not that I've recalled seeing mate...

There is no kicker (glassed in trim tab) in the tunnel at all. This, when combined with much less lifting surfaces (especially aft), obviously leads to the bow high attitude as per Woo's comments following... (and a very 'bow high' attitude when compared to the 328, and to a lesser extent, the 288 from what I remember of this model).

...They do tend to ride a bit bow high even with 2 strokes.... They definitely give you the sensation of wanting to launch skyward even invert moderate sea states. Bit unusual on that front...

Not that 15+ NE out from Manly would allow this 'launching skyward', but I definitely noticed the bow-high attitude Woo, especially on take-off (although this one had 2 x 200 Zuke V6's, so yes a bit of a heavy ass, but very fast, and very bow-high in comparison to the 328 which I know very well. However, I would have definitely not been travelling that comfortably that quickly, in my mono 685 either .

Not that I am saying 'no kicker' in the tunnel is a bad thing either, as this caused the 328's bad habit into a decent short-sharp head sea, especially the 328 models heavily decked out with teak floors throughout and all the bling up front/in the saloon & flybridge etc.

... they all seem to be fitted with aftermarket and enlarged extended anti-ventilation plates these days. All the ones around my area I see on lifts have the large plates, as they do need some extra left in the stern even at high speeds...

Yep, this one had them. Look like a Permatrim, but a bit narrower and longer, with a crease down the guts. Absolutely no sign of ventilation in the sloppy seas we were in, so if it were mine I would be trialling lifting the donks, as it would help reduce the bow-high attitude too (and possibly help reduce any mist ingestion???).

As for the pod leaking issues Garry mentioned, these ones sit quite high above the water at rest, however do have a deep 'tub' in the tops of them which are drained via a small skin fitting linked to another skin fitting in the side of the pod. The 'tub' is a separate moulding screwed into the pod, so one chance of water ingress around this seal. The skin fittings must be joined with a 'magic hose', or, a hose longer than the distance between fittings (to allow clamp fitting before screwing down the tub/top) . More importantly, there are no drain plugs in the pods of this one. WTF?? Not a good design! Could be ~30kg of water ballast in each pod!! Maybe a reason for the high bow!





Is this pod setup the same as the two PC's you mentioned/look after Garry?

Have also attached a PW article that gives a good historical look into the development of the 'cat' in Australia. I used to have the original PW write-ups on all the cats PW had or tested even from the 'AB' days, but can't locate them ... ! Maybe available from the SeaMedia library if anyone is chasing more info?
Cheers
Brendon

[Spaniard_King]

No ... the ones I look after are transom models... no pods

[baitable]

just get a glacier bay- still no complaints for me... oh.... i've started to fish with my paraanchor attached to the front of the boat... my cowlings very rarely touch water if at all. problem solved.