Cormorant,
Price difference between single 300 and twin 175 is roughly 10k.
With regards to the 250, I made do with a 225 but had to limit weight in board to 3 pob. Plus cruising was either at 27 knots, or not on the plane lol. The 250 had a great hole shot, but again it was either cruise at above 4500rpm or it's buried in the water.
I need something with a bit more ticker to be able to spin a larger diameter prop to get a slower plane speed.
I would only be saving $4k between a 250 and a 300. Considering the transom seated for 400hp, plus a lot of overseas reviews on 300s have been really good.
Now just trying to analyse the technical differences of the two motors. Things like real life fuel figure comparisons on similar boats.
Does the Suzuki larger prop diameter play a part in lower speed planing?
Does the Suzuki lean burn system really save the amount of fuel that they claim?
Given each trip I do up here is around 400km round trip, fuel usage will be a little more important than if I were only doing 150km round trips so to speak.
The kicker thing is more so for peace of mind... Its a very clostraphobic feeling being out at sea with no forced momentum, even if it be 2knts against the tide lol.
Apollo, come the 4th time mate, you tend to know how to make the missus feel sorry for you and give in quite easily!! Takes some hair pulling, Jim beam out of the bottle, midlife crisis talk with plenty of boat cleaning in between to make it all come together!! Haha