Looking back on this I think this is far better than a 6 week ban. While I am still firmly in the camp where I don't think drastic changes are needed at all, it is certainly better than a 4 month ban or even a 6 week ban. I would have preferred something like a 5 in possession limit, 40cm minimum with 2 fish over 70cm. The issue here is that there are a sh!t load of Snapper around, everyone knows that. Just that the numbers are mostly in the smaller brackets and hence they claim the "Biomass" is too low. By protecting more of the larger models (bigger spawners also) we are keeping larger fish in the Biomass for longer, spawning more. 5@40cm with 2 over 70cm would have made me happy. It would only take a year for the 35cm models to reach size and if my boat has 4 POB and I can manage 8 fish over 70cm and another 12 between 40 and 70cm then with the pearlies, parrot etc etc around that is a good day IMO and should keep the freezers at bay until the next trip.
My biggest laugh at this is that this has confirmed that this WHOLE process was about hammering Rec Anglers!!! Proven right here right now with this announcement. I said it from the start! Fisheries are there just to support the commercial sector! Not one mention of a TAC for Commercial Fisho's so for them it's business as usual????? I don't think Charter operators should have a TAC along with the Rec as lets face it the Charter Operators themselves aren't taking home the fish, it is the Rec Angler.
This was all about getting bigger profits for Commercial fishermen, nothing to do with stocks.