If the 2 stroke was propped for performance at that those revs for low speed planing rather than top end it wouldn't suffer that. It would suffer somewhere else unless hull and prop were 100% matched - yeah that rarely happens. A 2 stroke has more torque and reserve torque at just about all revs( especially low ) in general but how it is propped ( what gearbox) and used is the other half of the problem. Since the torque graphs for comparison use revs over torque one being higher than teh other at specific revs means nothing unless the prop and hull can use it effectively. If manufacturers would like industrial diesel motor manufacturers put out decent data it would be a help in motor selection for specific purpose as a general outboard is a compromise for different uses.
A 2 speed gearbox would make all the difference or a prop that pitched out at really high revs to give that top end ( yep they exist- 2 speed props for ski boats )
Basically a lot of motor issues are actually prop issues . Some hulls are not designed for a slow plane with the boat at a good attitude.
The way people load their boat up with extra weight these days I'm amazed some plane at all. Assumably later hulls designed with 4 strokes in mind and with live bait tanks from teh factory have taken that into accont but retrofit boats?
A prop is always a compromise and very few people prop their boat for mid range performance as they don't want to lose their top end ( wank) performance that is used for possibly 5% of engine hours unless ski racing.
Still amazes me the same motor with the same ports , cam is used for both skiing and offshore lugging and yep electronics can fill the gaps but that comes at a price.
Low speed planing - longer hull- hull extensions, pods, trim tabs , permatrims can all help if set up right.
People above have covered most all of the options. 4 Blade props that add stern lift can help but they can cause handling issues at higher speeds if it is overdone.
Ok so who is for a diesel with a 2 speed box or variable prop??