Another thing to throw in the mix on this question is the much maligned "Australian Builder's Plate".
Since the requirement came in for new boats to have one of these plates, it plays a role in this debate too.
For your info, the definition of a boat's length in this Standard, which applies nationally, is as follows:
"length—
a term having the same meaning as "length of the hull" in ISO 8666.
Note: The length that is used for the purpose of applying any relevant national or international standard is the "length" as defined within the particular standard."
It then goes on to define the "relevant national standards as follows:
"relevant national or international standard—
a standard having similar objectives and safety outcomes to those of the specific standards specified within this standard. Such standards shall be either published by a national or international standard setting organisation or expressed within the legislation of a jurisdiction having similar notions as to the value of life as Australia.
EXAMPLES
Examples of national and international standard setting organisations:
Examples of relevant standards within legislation:
- The American Boat and Yacht Council (ABYC),
- the European Committee of Standardization (CEN),
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and
- Standards Australia.
- The National Standard for Commercial Vessels; and
- US Federal Code of Regulations 33."
So I guess the answer is in there, somewhere - no wonder you can't get a straight answer from the authorities - you'd need to be a QC or naval architect..![]()
If your boat has an ABP or a Builders Plate attached to it that states the Standard to which the boat has been built, it seems rational that you'd cite the length of your boat measured according to that particular Standard.
Whilst the ABP does not require boat length to be stated, some builders plates do include this info so I'd imagine that you'd cite the length as stated on that plate....to be consistent.
Does that help? Sorry!![]()
ML