PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant VBA_SCRIPT - assumed 'VBA_SCRIPT' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/functions_navigation.php(802) : eval()'d code on line 1
Power or low hours? - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: Power or low hours?

  1. #16

    Re: Power or low hours?

    If the only real difference seems to be engines ....

    I'm, guessing by the size of the engines that the boats are about 5 1/2 to 6 metres in length.

    Having personally owned a 150 Honda I could do nothing less than give it a huge tick in the box ... they are in fact the same 2.4 Ltr engine thats in the Honda Euro. Had one of those as well and again, never missed a beat.

    Ask it to do whatever .... and it would every time .... and would do it exactly and better than expected ... fuel was fantastic, noise was negligible and would troll all day long ...

    I suppose you could have a look at the power curves etc for both motors if push comes to shove which would be readily available on their web sites .... lastly, how often is the 25 Horses going to make that much difference unless your the kind of fella that goes everywhere WOT ... (no offence intended)

    What else would you want!

  2. #17

    Re: Power or low hours?

    Quote Originally Posted by LoungeLizard View Post
    To answer a few questions:

    Hull is a Seafarer 6.0, from memory the recommended (sorry, not max rated as mentioned before) HP is 175. The boat will be an all-rounder, not so much for water sport so the 150 will do - I've been out on one with a 150 before and it was OK with 4 people on.

    Both motors are 2007 and have 5 year warranty so no worries there. Not sure about OEM dealers (is this different?), but according to the websites there are dealers for both locally.
    G'day,

    Thanks for the correction. I was wondering what the hell 150 and 175 was doing on a hull rated at 225.

    The Suzuki 175 is what I have on my 6M plate boat and it is ideal. The hours on the Suzuki VS the Honda is insignificant provided they have been serviced and run on clean fuel.

    I suggest you test drive both and look at relative hole shot. This is the power that gets you out of trouble in a sea. Also look at engine revs at (say) a constant 22kn. This will give you a guide to fuel consumption and range. My guess is that the Suzuki will prove a bit more economical.

    I suggest that the engines may be pretty much equal and the decision comes down to boat inclusions, hull and trailer conditio and your bargaining power.

    Regards,

    White Pointer

  3. #18
    Ausfish Platinum Member odes20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009

    Re: Power or low hours?

    Wheres all this Honda Kingship comin from?
    True Honda brought out the first range of 4 strokes but wow no one can deny that Yamaha and Suzy 4 strokes are amazing donks. Anyone who ever talked down a Suzy 175 better be sure they have tested one because they are ann awesome donk. When I first bought mine all the gainsayers were predicting slow holeshots (like the early honda 4 strokes LOL) slow acceleration and such other chatter, but their first run with me had them gob smacked.

    Im sure the honda is a great donk, but in this application it won;t hold a candle to the Suzy, and I have now done 650 hours on mine and no dramas,

    Cheers
    John

  4. #19

    Re: Power or low hours?

    LL

    Can you get a trial in both rigs to get some definitive answers on the abilities of both setups ? Its probably the only way you won't be left wondering.

    Cheers

  5. #20

    Re: Power or low hours?

    Hey John ....

    "Wheres all this Honda Kingship comin from?"

    Reliabilty good performance etc etc ....

    On the down side vs the Suzi .... Suzis are way better priced and dare I say it almost as good these days .... so totally agree, with you particularly if you are on a tighter budget !!

  6. #21
    Ausfish Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007

    Re: Power or low hours?

    Honda all the way, the zooks are not as good as everyone thinks they are and you will have better resale latter on when you sell it

  7. #22

    Re: Power or low hours?

    Quote Originally Posted by jake0 View Post
    Honda all the way, the zooks are not as good as everyone thinks they are and you will have better resale latter on when you sell it
    Why are they not as good as" everyone thinks they are". If you are gunna make statements like that substantiate them otherwise its just another bullshit yarn. No offence intended. Same boats one with 150 ,one with 175 ..no brainer in this instace all other things being equal.

  8. #23

    Re: Power or low hours?

    Guys,

    I don't want this to turn into a x vs y shitfight. From all accounts both the Suzuki and the Honda is a great motor that's very reliable and economical ... hence my dilemma

    My main question is would you take more power, or lower hours? Now, it's true that 250hrs is not a lot for the Suzuki, however for me the 200hrs difference is about 2 years worth of boating which is quite significant. Testing both boats will be difficult as one is a fair distance inland - it can be done but only if I'm really serious about buying.

  9. #24

    Re: Power or low hours?

    after all this to and fro, I guess the only way to decide which one to buy would be to get a sheet of paper and do a "walk around" of each boat, scoring on things like scratches and shine, upholstery, accessories, trailer construction and condition, then go for a test ride in each and do the same thing for the motors, either motor will go for years (but they are second hand) do as Spaniard King suggested and look for the best dealer near you that sells/services those two brands, and score that as well, the extra 25HP would be nice, how nice is anyones guess, but at least you have a chance to test them both, unlike if you were buying new, then it would only be a guess.

  10. #25

    Re: Power or low hours?

    Proof will be in the pudding!!

    No good hearing this and that about engines and boats. The best engine in the world wont be worthy a cracker if it's not set up correctly.

    Insist on a water test for both and go with your gut feeling. I would discard most of the opinionated owners thoughts in this post.
    Garry

    Retired Honda Master Tech

  11. #26
    Ausfish Platinum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006

    Re: Power or low hours?

    i'm not an opinionated owner, go for the most power loungelizard. this is a good heavy offshore boat and by the time you load it up you'll be thankful for the extra neddies. even though the extra 25hp up top will rarely be used, the extra 500cc in the suzuki should give a bit more torque.

    disregard all the krap people go on with about accords and vitaras, that's said by people who think with their hearts and don't use their brains. engineering wise both honda and suzuki are superb engine manufacturers and either motor will serve you well.

    like spaniardking has said earlier, are you in a location where accessing a licensed service agent could be a problem, if so go for the make you can get the best service for.

    don't worry too much about the hours, personally i'd rather a rig that gets used all the time because the owners are less likely to tolerate something being wrong with it (ie. there might be less issues with the motor and it has sat around doing nothing a lot less).

    look at the service history and also get the motor inspected by someone of your choice and maybe the ecu interrogated for any history/issues. check for corrosion and general condition, when were the anodes last replaced? who serviced it etc.?

    if all things are good and equal, go for the power every time, one day you might need it.

  12. #27

    Re: Power or low hours?

    power power

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •