I am still happy with my 600w in around 80m. It struggles a bit in anything much deeper.
Neil
A Proud Member of
"The Rebel Alliance"
Thanks Greg. I agree that it should be a slow process. I think I'll give it a go without the insulating insert as I can always make the hole bigger later and use the insulator if I find any issues. Also, mine will be accessible via the engine bay, so not too hard to alter down he track. The other advantage of not using the insulator is that there will be less of a protrusion and therefore hopefully better performance at speed.
So far as 1kw versus 600 watt goes..... the only reason I went the 1kw job was that the sounder had the capability and thought I would match the transducer accordingly. I was very tempted to stay with a JRC unit and 600w transducer as my old set up was great up to 100 odd metres. I doubt I'll ever need the capability, but it will be there
Thanks,
Dave.
I am sure it could be done but it needs to be easily inspected for issues. What about a wet box set up? Dave S has one in his rig that I believe works well. I stayed with the plastic 600w because of the risk. Wish airmar would come up with a 1k plastic unit.
ROLL TIDE, ROLL.................
Regards,
Peter
No not at all I have a 600 watt element thru hull on my koden and it bashes the bottom at 200 meters no problem. I have the same for the Garmin but it struggles over 40 meters.
Comparing the 2 the koden is substantially better with a 600 watt element .
The garmins work better with the 1000 watt element but they just dont build a good sounder in this range. I can get it to work but it is a frustrating piece of kit to drive and see both sounders side by side you really can see the difference.
"light gear big fish big fun"