Kia sportage good littel 4x4 with proper transfer case & low range great small 4X4
Kia sportage good littel 4x4 with proper transfer case & low range great small 4X4
Whatever you get
make sure it is real 4WD/AWD as some are not
Like the Mazda CX7/9, Honda CRV and no doubt some others
these are FWD with limited drive to the rear(about 30%) once the front loses traction(or you are already bogging down)
Toyotas and Subarus are at least constant AWD with a limited slip centre diff so you get at least 50:50 drive front and rear
If You Can't Run With The Dogs....... Stay On The Porch
I can understand that, i think a person needs 2 vehicles if 95% of their driving is in urban and inter urban areas. The cost effectiveness and ease of a standard car for this part can go a long way toward meeting at least the statutory costs of owning a real 4wd.
Little bit of organising involved but in the end it's without doubt the best of both worlds with the bonus of enjoying the 4wd experience a bit more because mostly that's it's main job.
Also it's nice what a person can get home with a larger 4wd, big fridge, bed, large screen TV, furniture, motorbike...are some of the ways to help offset/justify the extra costs over any one year and of coarse tow the boat.
These justifications keep one in my garage even the old one I own, otherwise I would probably be driving some 4cyl FWD like my wifes 24/7.
cheers fnq
THAAAANNNKK YOUUU!!!!
FFS i think the main problem here is the old codgers who have issues with keeping up with advances in technology.
Take for example the Pajero. Ignorants bag it out with its all independent suspension, but dig deeper and you will find it has some very impressive features, like an optional rear diff lock, and a VERY impressive traction control.
My point is this; don't be so ignorant as to assume that atleast some 'soft-roaders' aren't advancing also.
A lot of ye ol' salties here would do well to do a YT search on 'subaru awd'.
Subaru's are like no other soft-roader in that there's a true mechanical connection to all the wheels... None of this computer controlled 'reactive' crap.
The uniqueness with Subaru is that even though it has a gun drivetrain, it doesn't have the weight of a big 4wd. My forester consitently shows up Patrol's in dune climbs...
I've taken my Forester to Orchid beach without being stuck at all. What other softroader can say that?
I am lucky enough to have a 'real' 4WD in my garage next the Forester. I drive a 2007 STR Navara Dual cab with allow tray and ladder racks, so I certainly get the best of both worlds here, but I just simply prefer my Forester on the beach, it shits on the Navara. But I am talking the turbo Forester here, the N/A may be a little less impressive (to me at least).
I don't want to turn this into a Forester vs the rest crap again. I may already have but there are some ripper alternatives now, the Old Kia Sorento is tops in the diesel. ladder frame chassis, part time dual range 4WD etc. Or the Hyundai Terracan also fits this bill. Both are sub $40K.
Also the new chalenger is a serious offering now (I think I may get one), nice diesel, excelletn 4WD system plus TC and heaps of space. Also in the mid $40K bracket. The Pathfinder is ok too but I don't like the IRS and plastic underbody, seems to want to be offroad, but laks the essentials. It too has an exceletn TC system.
Al the above cars in deisel form will use less fuel than a Forester, but will never be as safe or fun to drive in all weather conditions.
What are we talking about here when we say soft roader anyway. I see the topic morphing slightly and the lines blurring somewhat. I wouldn't have referred to a Prado as a soft-roader.
You are probably taking about me when you make this comment and that is fair enough. I agree. However those who do not know the vehicle could be excused for thinking of it as a soft roader. I did before i drove one. Lets face it, they are too pretty to be a bush basher. But hey as they say looks can be deceiving.
Cheers
Daisy
Yoot. I like what you do with your Sub' so dont get me wrong when I say this but I dont rate the Navara as that much different in 4wd capacity overall than the Sub and I have no doubt the Sub craps on it on the beach...the Navara is a far cry from a Land Rover/Patrol/Cruiser.
Cheers mate
Boat: Seafarer Vagabond
Live: Great South East....love Moreton Bay fishing
Some soft roaders are good in 1 area (eg, yoots subie on the beach). And some just scrape by in all area's. I HATE the soft roader debate. NAME a vehicle and people who have that 4x4 will comment. For me I dont rate soft roaders at all ONLY BECAUSE OF THE FACT I DONT LIKE TURNING AROUND AND NOT BEING ABLE TO MAKE IT SOMEWHERE OR DAMAGE THE HELL OUT OF MY TRUCK TRYING TO.
Lets try and get some categories here....
Categories are.. (after vehicle is Named)
1. Sand
2. Mud
3. Water
4. Rocks
5. Bitumen
sub categories are...
6. Articulation (suspension set up)
7. Clearance
8. Strength (gearbox, engine, drive lines, cv's)
9. Capability (Modifications available?)
Name your vehicle and comments are welcome... Ill start a new thread