Reply With Quote6" diameter float is mandatory
Failure to comply, results in the pots being deemed as abandoned and a hazard. Therefore are free game for anyone to take.
I can't find a regulation anywhere in the DPI Fishing Regulations document that states a crab pot requires a float. The diagram provided has a picture of one but it is not stated anywhere that it is mandatory.
Do I need one or not?
Can anyone solve this?
Cheers
Woppa
6" diameter float is mandatory
Failure to comply, results in the pots being deemed as abandoned and a hazard. Therefore are free game for anyone to take.
hey there woppa...as of march this year you have to have floats on your pots now...
New crab laws introduced 22 October 2009Originally Posted by woppa
I can't find a regulation anywhere in the DPI Fishing Regulations document that states a crab pot requires a float. The diagram provided has a picture of one but it is not stated anywhere that it is mandatory.
Do I need one or not?
Can anyone solve this?
Cheers
Woppa
New crab laws introduced
New crabbing rules designed to protect the sustainability of Queensland's crab fishery have been introduced.
Minister for Primary Industries, Fisheries and Rural and Regional Queensland Tim Mulherin said the changes had been implemented to ensure future generations could enjoy catching species such as the famous Queensland mud crab.
"Changes to the rules include a new single measurement requirement for mud crabs," Mr Mulherin said.
"The size of the crab now needs to be measured across the top of the shell (carapace) at the widest point with a 15cm minimum size limit.
"Previously fishers could measure the underside of the crab if the topside was damaged - this new measurement is irrespective of whether the shell is damaged or chipped.
"While the size limit for a crab is unchanged, the single measurement removes the capacity for smaller crabs to be taken by fishers using the alterna te under body measurement."
Mr Mulherin said the changes had also been made to crab pot use.
"If a crab pot is attached to a fixed object, such as a tree, it must be attached by a rope with a tag visible above the high water mark.
"The tag has to bear the owner's name for recreational fishers or boat mark for commercial fishers," he said.
"All other pots must have a surface float attached measuring 15 cm in all directions."
Mr Mulherin said changes had also been made to the use of trot line apparatus for commercial fishers.
For more information contact the Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries Business Information Centre on 13 25 23 or visit www.dpi.qld.gov.au
Media: Matt Watson 3239 3120
And not those bloody dark green mongrels either.
Rod
My dictionary defines green as ‘unripe, immature, undeveloped'. Perfect description.
Most political parties are seen as interested in what the voters think, the Greens are seen as thinking the community should be interested in what they think.
Sure mate, if you want to be found in possession of illegal fishing apparatus or accused of share-farming/pot theft, go right ahead
Blueline is on the mark.
simon
The ocean is the ultimate solution - Frank Zappa
http://s428.photobucket.com/albums/qq9/slyman71/
This is taken DIRECTLY from the legislation found here: http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LE.../FisherR08.pdf
Using crab apparatus
(1) A recreational fisher may use a crab pot, collapsible trap, dilly
or inverted dilly (each of which is an item of crab apparatus)
only if the fisher uses the crab apparatus for taking a crab in
compliance with—
(a) subsections (2) to (4); and
(b) subsections (5) and (6), if applicable.
(2) The recreational fisher must not use more than a total of 4
items of crab apparatus, including any combination of items
of crab apparatus, to take crabs.
(3) Also, the recreational fisher must ensure that—
(a) a tag, on which is written the surname and address of the
owner of the crab apparatus, is attached to the apparatus;
and
(b) the crab apparatus is attached by a rope to either—
(i) a float complying with subsection (4); or
(ii) a fixed object above the high water mark, including
for example, a jetty or tree; and
(c) if the crab apparatus is attached to a fixed object under
paragraph (b)(ii)—a tag, on which is written the
surname of the owner of the apparatus, is attached to the
part of the rope above the high water mark.
(4) For subsection (3)(b)(i), the float must—
(a) be light coloured and clearly visible on the surface of
the water; and
(b) be at least 15cm in all its dimensions; and
(c) have written on it the surname of the owner of the crab
apparatus to which it is attached.
Its always wise to check the legeslation......you just cant depend on the published guides.
Just about every one has a mistake or omission.....and there are a variety of changes that will be taking place over the next little while............you have to be xxxxxx Sherlock Holmes to keep up with it all.
cheers
Its the details, those little details, that make the difference.
Actively setting an illegal apparatus would be a bad idea, but I've got no probelm emptying an illegally marked pot up on the bank if its in the way.Sure mate, if you want to be found in possession of illegal fishing apparatus or accused of share-farming/pot theft, go right ahead
Blueline is on the mark.
you know i have never seen a proper crab pot with name tags on them. well not around coochie anyway. they seem to be mainly old containers or sometimes a white buoy without tags.
i'm really not sure if fisheries actually go out and check the waters for these pots?
if they do they sure to miss a hell of a lot of illegal pots.
Thanks for your answers everyone. I guess that answers my question.
Tight lines
Woppa
I guess most people dont realise your name needs to be on the float.
I warned people out of the green zone at shorncliffe again the other day. They had actually read the sign at the boat ramp and misunderstood it. They were not going out to break the rules, in fact they were trying to follow them. The real problem is that the rules dont make sense to a lot of people. If you take a read of the legislation I posted its not exactly the easiest of reading.
Maybe they could put BIG signs at places like the Gayundah Arboretum, that sa simply "YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO F&$KIN FISH HERE". I saw about 8 people fishing along the path there on the weekend....but they were the reverse baseball cap wearing, dark skinned WRX driving types with the gold chains around the neck......no way I was going to tell them they shouldnt be fishing there. But then again...they probably would ignore those signs anyway.
The thing is either non of this is actually being monitored or no one really cares and are sick of being in an over regulated police state.
It does make me wonder however the agenda or motivations of some of the law enforcers.
Hell even I'm not clear on how it all works myself or whats involved regarding what fisheries and msq officers can do or can't do or will do?
I just wonder because as i have seen on these boards any one of us can go out on any givern day and see illegal crab pots out there.
But fisheries and MSQ can't?
or is it a case of no man power to actually do anything?
or is it a case of "lets try education" first before the fines start rolling out kind of like a moratorium before they all get serious?
or is it selective hearing and seeing?
Now this isn't to say that they aren't out there pulling out illegal crab pots because i don't know the stats on that.
If a crab pot is illegal according to law then does that crab pot become know as "litter"?
If so then anyone can pick up illegal crab pots and take them under the "litter" rule and cleaning up the environment. It would not be seen as tampering or interfering with another persons property if it's deemed litter
It's just all too hard at the end of the day i think.
I can understand the rules on crab pots and have no issues with it at all.
It just seems there are rules for one person but another for others.
But i am pretty sure the bigger issue regarding crab pots is crab pot thieves which is difficult to prove with video or photo evidence.
I was shocked when i reported an illegal swing mooring after it had ripped a big hole in the back of by boat only for MSQ to say it would 3 months before they could get to it!
The thieves and illegal activity have it easy on our waters!
It is simply a case of lack of man power. Now if our idiot government had actually used DPIF to manage the fisheries, then they could have given the DPIF all the people and boats that were given to the EPA. But the would rather double up on resources so they look good for the greens.
Dont worry, you are not the only one who is frustrated by this, you should talk to a lot of the boating and fisheries patrol and they are in the same frame of mind.
A crab pot is and always will be a fishing apparatus. Therefore it is illegal for anyone to intefere with it regardless of the condition its in.
I spoke at length with a guy from Boating and Fisheries Patrol. I wanted to somehow get permission to remove abandoned pots from nundah creek, but its not possible without legislation change. When I get the time I am going to start hounding the minister for a solution on this issue.
Boating and Fisheries Patrol will, and do remove illegal pots. However, when you consider they have 6 crews at pinkenba, and 2 at ...(wellington point?) to run the whole of the brisbane region and its tributaries you soon realise pretty quickly exactly how under resourced they are.
I need to contact the EPA (DERM) and get some indication of how many staff/boats they hae in action now.
I honestly beleive that the crab pot theft issues is smaller than people think. A lot of people claim that pots are stolen/ interfered with when actually they float away downstream in big tides and bait is taken by eels and bait fish.
One thing you will notice is that on very big tides you will always get a post here on AF stating that someone has had pots stolen. Coincidence?
Posting Permissions
