They could ban 4WDs on beaches in a heartbeat--and that really gets one's heart beating. What if they blundered onto our beaches with the same political bias and snake oil chicanery as the Marine Park Authority whose ultimate quest seems to be to zone off anything that's wet?
So with these trepidations, which kept me raiding the Temazepam bottle nightly, I picked up the phone and demanded answers from the National Parks and Wildlife NSW.
The first surprise was that I got to speak to an intelligent person right away and in no time was speaking to the top Honcho. The next surprise is how concerned they are about their public image and of course the enormous detrimental rhetoric, which I believed has been augmented by the goings-on of the spurious Marine Park management here in Port Stephens.
The first assurance I was offered was that their was no mandate to ban 4WDs from the two main beaches here in Port Stephens, Stockton Beach and Mungo Beach. However there were closures due to the recent storms that have caused enormous erosion of the beaches.
I have been looking at the condition of the closed sections myself and can't dispute that at high tide there is just nowhere other than on the vegetation to drive at high tide -- and driving on the vegetation just compounds the erosion problem. Still, in spite of the closures, rogue 4WDrivers still persist.
There are also a couple of 'havens' on Mungo Beach where 4WDs aren't allowed to go. One is south of Mungo Beach 4WD access to Dark Point. This section, which includes parking, picnic facilities and pedestrian access is often frequented by families and very popular with beach anglers. So in reality who wants yahoos roaring up and down a beach where you're trying to fish or your kids are at play? That's the next point: In the words of a ranger whom I later struck up a conversation with, he said about their recent inclusion in the management plan of Stockton Beach, "When we got there it was like the wild west." Being well aware of this is the main reason why in the past I've never used the beach; so that's been a self-imposed ban due to the reckless use of the beach by others.
The reality is that if you couldn't do the drive from Mungo to the Big Gibber, checking out all the banks and gutters along the way it would be sacrilegious to our way of life, and equally so if you couldn't 4WD up to Indian Head on Fraser Island, or all the way along Stockton. So what are these guys really up to? Well, all the parks have to have a 'park management plan' that's supposed to appease all interested groups -- and that includes anglers, 4WDs, picnickers, tourists, ecologists, and those concerned with sacred sites.
But I must admit I like the way the management plan is currently working and I have a severe distain of yahoos behaving badly and generally tearing up our revered beaches when it just isn't necessary. Although if I was 17 again I'd probably be one of the offenders if some park ranger didn't give me a wake-up call.
Right now I'm gearing up my own 4WD to extend my beach fishing grounds and I'll be the first to spit the dummy if the National Parks and Wildlife do eventually unreasonably lock up certain beaches to 4WDs. There is a 40kph speed zone here on all beaches -- not sure of Fraser's, which used to be 80kph. And it begs the question: Why does anyone need to drive at 80ks on a beach? Maybe the more isolated beaches, but certainly not here.
My own opinion is that beach 4WDriving is not such a big thrill in itself, merely access to some very special Aussie places and I'd hate to see the yahoos ruin it for everyone.
So what's the verdict, good guys or bad guys?