Hi all,
I've been noticing some comments recently in a few threads about 'cheap' gear in comparison with more 'expensive' gear.
Someone wrote recently that the rod itself doesn't really matter (a cheapy will do) as long as the terminals are good quality & the lure is presented properly.
If hooking the fish is the main thing - what about landing it?
There was a recent thread enquiry about what was a good cheap rod to buy. One response was something like 'why not get the best you can afford, instead of going cheap?' I reckon that was good advice even though some fishos do not agree.
Personally, I've gone cheap before and have generally ended up having to buy again. I've seen a members signature recently saying that the poor man always pays twice!?
Why buy twice? Twice can even end up being 'thrice!" Then after you get tired of replacing gear that lets you down, you end up buying better quality. Why not get the decent stuff in the first place (or at least start saving for it).
It's happened to me before with buying cheap sunnies! Now I buy decent ones.
(if you buy it cheap, you'll buy it again)
I've enjoyed my fishing much more since I stopped buying 'el-cheapo' gear.
Better tackle gives you a feeling of confidence and a sense of fulfilment that your are doing what you like doing (fishing..) and are enjoying it with good quality equipment (that won't let you down).
Fishing in PNG might be a bit different to many other locations, but in my first few outings I had two baitcast reels (a Corsair and an Induron) that were stuffed up good & proper within three seconds of hooking a black bass.
When I upgraded & started using Calcuttas & similar the bass were the ones on the receiving end.
I know there is such a thing as 'mid-range' priced tackle and some of it is quite good (like Jarvis Walker & Silstar) but generally, is it better to buy 'cheap' or not?
So how do other readers feel about this topic?