Originally Posted by
Chong
This argument and all the arguments to come over conservation, recreational fishing, commercial fishing, four wheel driving, shooting, camping and the never ending list that the greens/conservationists will use, can not be won by protest.
The greens/ conservationists have the backing of the media and the political system, and use it, fair enough. We in general (the every day bloke), urge for conservation and preservation of fish stocks, camping and all things that will keep our recreational activities on going for generations to come, yes?
As long as these issues are approved in a common sense approach and with serious consultation to ALL that it affects, common ground in policy, practice and application should be able to be achieved. The perfect out come, and all would be happy, yes?
Arguing, fighting, rallies are all good, but I think that we need to understand the view from the other side, know exactly what we are up against. Empathize (I know it is hard) but if we can see it from their point, maybe, just maybe they will start to see it from ours, and a mutual, common sense approach can be taken to all these issues.
The more we say “yes” to these closures, green zones, bag limits just maybe we might get the chance to actually have a real say before a decision is made, and once we are in, we are in for good. That’s how the green/ conservationists did it, they said what everyone at the time wanted to hear, “ save the great barrier reef”, “Recreational fishing kills to many fish, turtles, dugong..”, “horses kill national parks” and so on.
I have been involved with the TFPQ, I have sent my e-mails, singed petitions, called local members, I’m sure it all has some sort of impact but it’s always been in protest, I said “no”.
Just a thought, maybe a slightly different approach, anything may help as we are defiantly up against the wall.
Phil, keep up the good work, not trying to side track your post, just had this in my head and thought it may help.
Cheers,
Chong
i await the grill