Roughasguts, the correct details and history of the boat i think is somewhat sketchy.
this was the details i had at the time http://www.boatingservices.com.au/ed.php?de=22894
I don't know if that builder Peter Muiler or Muller? even exists.
the beam there says 11' 6" but the survey said 3.04m which is 9' 7". so some discrepancies here and there and i never know what to believe.
I can pm you the survey report but a bit reluctant to post it here in public as i don't want it up for ridicule or anything. It's one of those things that probably only other people with timber boats might understand i don't know. I love em
One of the reasons i went for this boat was after many months of searching it was the only one i came across that basically had the best open plan i wanted to suite my wife and wheelchair and live aboard for a few days at a time. oh and under 30K was a clincher too as i found many boats at the 27 to over 30' mark but where 45K to 60K mark but i still would have had to spend money renovating to suite my needs.
So this way i felt that for a 30' under 30K i had room to spare even knowing about the repairs that need doing I felt i would come out with a great boat in the end.
I am trying to get away with not spending any more than 10K on it to get it to the stage I want it at and not have over capatilsed on it. And its something that is looking quite possible at this stage.
The motor I was told was a 4ltr ford and came of a car about 8 months ago. Apparently reconditioned. no proof of that except the motor does run well and felt like it did 15knots easy on the test run i did.
I have to get a closer look at the engine to find out exactly what it is like a 3.91 0r 3.99 etc... to help pinpoint the year. I want to put a better K&N filter on it too for the carb as the one thats on it looks like it got ran over by a truck and then squashed back on.
The survey guy felt it was a Hartley New Tidesong approx 1969.
Each time i climb aboard this boat it automatically puts a smile on my face It just has that great warm feel about it.
I also had to do some research on this idea some people have and recommend using epoxy to skin the hull. The surveyor recommended it be stripped back to timber and dried then several coats of epoxy applied then the primer and paint etc....
But after talking to a few people and someone who has just spent over 2 years rebuilding an old timber boat I have decided very much against it.
Since this boat has been in the water for approx 40 years its actually best to only ever paint it. If i epoxy it it i will more than likely run into problems once the boards move and the epoxy cracks and water gets in between it and the timber.
I have read all the pros and cons and came to the conclusion as many others have that its basically a waste of money that does very little unless its done from a new timber boat then it may have advantages.
So i am glad not go down the soda blasting and epoxy route spending thousands of dollars on that idea.