Originally Posted by
Nugget
There has been some interesting comments and a lot of confusion from anglers I know and respect on this thread. The main question seems to be - why hide a specific location yet advocate no closed areas, no green zones?
Let me give you my understanding of it all.
The problem is concentration on a specific pinpoint area not general fishing in an area.
Consider this - Why do we promote the release of large flathead (breeders) when we congratulate catches of whiting over 40cm also female breeders?
The reason is the ease of capture big breeding flathead congregate in a small area close to bar entrances once a year they are easy prey.
Big whiting do not follow similar habits they are not easy prey.
This is the same reason many anglers and magazines will not give out GPS marks, because it promotes pulse fishing people hit the GPS mark because it is easy to find and a known hot spot.
This is the same reason there are 50 boats on the Harry Atkinson every weekend because its a known spot!
Lots of Sunday anglers wet a line dispersed around Mud Island every weekend but given a GPS mark from a known expert, they will congregate on it till the cows come home because thats the spot **** said he fishes.
(Interestingly, those that catch the really big fish are usually the ones doing the hard yards researching / prospecting and searching not those following the reports they have read.)
Closing large areas with green zones and not disclosing specific pinpoint areas are two different things.
In hindsight, I would never have posted this thread in the first place but at the time, I was told this sink hole was going to be headline news on all three stations including GPS marks and underwater footage of the fish.
I wanted to get in first and ask anglers to show some restraint.
I think we did manage to prevent some detailed info from going to air and that will prevent a lot of casual anglers from going there.
Nugget ><>