Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Andrew Laming In Trouble

  1. #16

    Re: Andrew Laming In Trouble

    Quote Originally Posted by uripper View Post
    Dereck

    You put up this post "Andrew Laming In Trouble" - they were the only words of your own you used (very precise & targeted) - the rest were 'quotations' from other sources.

    At the time me thought your post smacked of politics, inuendo & slander - seemed like you were throwing it around - hopefully I'm wrong about that.

    You were invited to respond then by another poster - but didn't??

    Following the conclusion of the AFP investigation, perhaps you might care to respond now??

    MalM

    PS I've PM'd this post to you as well - look forward to hearing from you.
    At the time this was originally posted Andrew was quite vocal about the Moreton Bay issues, positively I might add, so he was a newsworthy person to the fishing community.

    The first two posts were direct copies of news articles.

    The heading - well I would consider that anyone reported as being investigated by the Federal Police could be considered as "In Trouble" particularly when you consider that a definition of "trouble" is 'an event causing distress or pain'. I am sure this unpleasantness (to use his words) caused him much distress.

    End of story.

  2. #17

    Re: Andrew Laming In Trouble

    Good to see apositive outcome for yourself finally Andrew.
    Thanks from this A/F memebr too for putting ina submission to the EPA.

  3. #18

    Re: Andrew Laming In Trouble

    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Bullock View Post
    End of story.
    fair enough - thanks for the reply

    here's to tight lines & screeming reels

    MalM

  4. #19

    Re: Andrew Laming In Trouble

    Andrew

    Been a while Andrew. 364days since that last post you replied to.

    You say you are still making your submission??????? hope you got it in, with time to spare

    cheers UN

  5. #20

    Thumbs down Re: Andrew Laming In Trouble

    Quote Originally Posted by UNCLE NUGGY View Post
    Andrew

    Been a while Andrew. 364days since that last post you replied to.

    You say you are still making your submission??????? hope you got it in, with time to spare

    cheers UN
    "Uncle Nuggy"

    This is your first & only post. No hello. No intro. None of the usual new member stuff.

    Yet you make what appears to be a very pointed remark about another Ausfish Member followed by a rather unusal question.


    Perhaps we should ask the Administrator to cross reference some ISP addresses & see what is revealed?????

    Uncle Nuggy eh?

    MalM

  6. #21

    Re: Andrew Laming In Trouble

    HELLO uripper

    obviously i mist the ethects committie meeting

    364 days is a fact

    no harm in questions

    cross reference all you want, i am just a fisho trying to have a chat

    THANKYOU

    UN

  7. #22

    Re: Andrew Laming In Trouble

    Quote Originally Posted by UNCLE NUGGY View Post
    obviously i mist the ethects committie meeting
    obviously



    and you missed the spelling committee meeting too

  8. #23

    Re: Andrew Laming In Trouble

    Quote Originally Posted by gelsec View Post
    obviously



    and you missed the spelling committee meeting too


    :grin::grin::grin:

    1. Funny comment about the spelling...

    2. Does seem very suspicious the way posters come into forums at times with very pointed posts yet no history or obvious motivation. They usually disappear just as quickly as they appear!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •